data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/183d6/183d6751eb73187ee5dbb198ebbbba6eda6aa496" alt=""
I'm wondering whether systematic theology - like that espoused by Grudem et al, where a collection of quotations are built up under a given heading, so that absolutes may be derived and applied to the circumstances of our lives, draws perhaps on a very ancient tradition. The Talmud made up of rules and interpretative discussion is referred to in Mark 7:3-4 as "the tradition of the elders". The Pharisees created an 'oral Torah' - an interpretation of the Torah that was in effect a binding interpretation of the law so that it might not be manipulated and so that it might be applied directly to everyday life despite changing times. Grudem et al appear to do exactly this - they take the very words of the Bible, do away with context, even down-play the original authors' intentions and purposes, dwell not on the original audiences for whom the original instruction was aimed and seek to apply the letter of the law to contemporary situations. A perfect example of this would be in their application of passages like 1 Tim 2:12.
The Pharisees' 'tradition of the fathers' was created to ensure that the law was obeyed, a worthy motivation which we should respect but isn't is interesting how Jesus, Himself, had difficulty with many of these traditions, and was in trouble on numerous occasions, and most particularly in His ways of behaving on the Sabbath? Food for thought there indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment