Hooker, women and homosexuals

I have a feeling that in exploring Richard Hooker, I will at the same time come to grasp some of the reasons for our Anglican infighting, that it has a kind of inevitability about it in a church without a tight confessional doctrinal package.

We are instead a church governed by only 39 articles, confessing creeds of four councils and worshipping God through a book of Common Prayer, or Common Worship, (which does not quite replace the prayer book) and a lectionary so that we might read the Scriptures together and in order. We also have the ordinal to govern the ceremonies pertaining to the offices.

Richard Hooker's was a generous orthodoxy in which he argued that those mistaken were unlikely to be damned. He insisted very much on something rather akin to indaba - a listening process, so that we might all learn from each other and together. He was less antagonistic and more optimistic.  Scripture is infallible but it doesn't pertain to governing every detail of our life with prescription, we need reason to work out how our lives might be led according to the supernatural duties of scripture. We understand what is morally right by looking at human nature as God has created it. Hooker is less enthusiastic about tradition and holds fast to the supremacy of Scripture but he expects us to be thinking beings and rather like Tom Wright's five act play idea, asks that we work out how the church conducts itself based on what has been revealed to us by God and the church will change as it adapts to new times and different cultures. There are, of course, some absolutes, particularly pertaining to salvation.

I have a feeling that his method will impact my thinking regarding what today threatens to pull the church apart. Forces are not coming in at us from the outside as they did at the Reformation, Puritans on the one hand and Catholics on the other but from the inside. Factions within the church disagree over the ordination/consecration of women and the place of those in same-sex relations. As I explore Hooker's Lawes of Ecclesiastical Polity, I will try to hazard an educated guess as to what his stance would have been on these two issues and what he would have proposed as solutions, whether I get all that in to 3000 words is another matter. For now I will leave you with one thing with which surely no one can disagree:

Hooker reflects that we are most happy when we are enjoying God.

Then we are happy, therefore, when fully we enjoy God, as an object wherein the powers of our souls are satisfied even with the everlasting delight; so that although we be man, yet by being unto God united we live as it were the life of God.